Tag Archives: Theology

The Coming Judgment of the Nations

In Matthew 25:31-46, the Lord Jesus Christ prophesied of a future judgment of the nations (Cp., Joel 3:2). In the King James Bible, the “nations” or the “heathen” are references to the Gentile nations, in contradistinction to the nation of Israel. Furthermore, the Greek word translated “nations” is ethnoi, which is also the word translated throughout the N.T. as Gentiles. In this passage, it is evident that at the Second Advent of Christ, Gentiles alive on earth are to be judged as individuals rather than nations, since individuals from “all nations” will be present in Christ’s Millennial Kingdom (Revelation 7:9), and the purpose of this judgment is to determine whether or not an individual Gentile will be granted entrance into it. For comparison with the other coming judgments, see the CHART: THE FOUR JUDGMENTS IN SCRIPTURE.

The Gentiles will be separated into two groups: those set on the Lord’s right hand are categorized as “sheep”, whereas those set on His left hand are categorized as “goats” (v. 33). The destiny of the sheep is to “inherit the kingdom prepared for [them] from the foundation of the world” (v. 34). Note from this is evident that it was always part of the plan of God that Gentiles would have an inheritance in the kingdom. Although it is Israel’s destiny to be “high above all nations of the earth” (Deuteronomy 26:19; 28:1) in that kingdom, that promise to Israel necessitates that there be Gentile nations as well.

The standard of this judgment of the Gentiles (in summary) will be whether they provided food, water, lodging, clothing, medical care, and fellowship (vv. 35-36) to a group of people the Lord calls “my brethren” (v. 40). The “brethren” of the Lord Jesus Christ are the Jews (cf. Romans 9:3-5). Thus, the standard of this judgment is derived directly from the Abrahamic covenant; namely, whether these Gentiles have “blessed” or “cursed” the descendants of Abraham (Genesis 12:3). As Christ performs this judgment on Gentiles alive on earth at the time of the Second Advent, the immediate context of this judgment is the 70th Week of Daniel (Daniel 9:27), or the 7-year tribulation period that immediately precedes the Second Advent. During this period of time, Satan and his Antichrist will attempt to exterminate the Jewish people worldwide (Revelation 12:13,17), and the Gentiles will be held accountable for whether they aided or forsook the Jews during their greatest time of existential peril.

Those Gentiles found to have aided the Jews will be granted entrance into the Millennial Kingdom. Those found to have forsaken the Jews will be immediately cast “into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels” (v. 41). From this we infer that the Lake of Fire, the final destination of the wicked of all ages, was not a part of the original creation, but “prepared” after the angelic rebellion. However, although God prepared the Lake of Fire as a place of punishment for the rebellious angels, He will also use it to punish rebellious men (Revelation 20:11-15), and that punishment will be “everlasting”. In contrast, those “righteous” Gentiles enter into “life eternal” (v. 46).

Since the Church is complete at the rapture, and the rapture of the Church (to heaven) occurs before the 7-year tribulation period (1 Thessalonians 1:10; Revelation 3:10), no member of the Body of Christ will be subject to this judgment. Indeed, all attempts to view the Church as subject to this judgment have introduced irreconcilable theological contradictions. Namely, whereas salvation for individuals in the Body of Christ is “by grace, through faith … not of works” (Ephesians 2:8-9; Cp., Titus 3:5), the determination of whether these Gentiles who have survived the Tribulation receive “life eternal” (v. 46) clearly involves their works1 (vv. 35-39; 42-44).

This Judgment of the Nations has been misunderstood by those on both sides of the theological spectrum, including the left (liberal) and the right (conservative), because they fail to interpret it literally. Theological liberals see a final judgment of all men based on compassion shown to others; from this error emerges a social gospel (of works) applied to all men, which is heresy. But theological conservatives have also struggled to interpret this passage properly, since they presuppose that salvation “by grace, through faith … not of works” applies to all men in every dispensation, which on its face is clearly contradicted in the Judgment of the Nations.

The resolution of this apparent contradiction is the recognition of dispensational distinctions between salvation for the Church during the Dispensation of Grace and that of Gentiles during the Tribulation. Whereas believers during the Church Age as saved by faith alone, believers during the Tribulation must also bless the descendants of Abraham according to the promises made to him by God (Genesis 12:3), which introduces an element of works in addition to faith (which is required in every dispensation; cf. Hebrews 11:6). Is salvation by faith alone, or by faith and works? It depends on which dispensation is in view.

A final observation of the distinctions between the “righteous” sheep (v. 37) and the unrighteous goats in this passage is that the “righteous” quote the words of the Lord verbatim (Cp., vv. 35-39), whereas the unrighteous merely summarize the words of the Lord (Cp., vv. 42-44) and in effect “diminish” (Deuteronomy 4:2) or “take away” (Revelation 22:19) from them2. Might this typologically point to the omission of many of the words of God in modern Bible versions based on the so-called Critical Text? Such a grievous sin, at least during the Tribulation period, will be judged by having one’s name blotted out of the Book of Life (Revelation 22:19).

ENDNOTES:

  1. Note also that during the Tribulation all must refrain from worshipping the Beast, and taking his mark, else they cannot be saved (Revelation 14:9-11). ↩︎
  2. In their defense, the unrighteousness would surely allege that their version of the words of the Lord means the same thing. ↩︎


The Relationship of the Church to the New Covenant

The relationship of the Church (i.e., the Body of Christ, which is being built during the present Dispensation of Grace) to the New Covenant is the subject of long and considerable debate among theologians. On the one hand, Replacement theologians view the Church as having entirely “replaced” the nation of Israel as the one and only people of God, and for this reason they view the Church as the party with which God has made the New Covenant, and that the New Covenant is in effect today. On the other hand, some Dispensationalists of the early 20th century concluded there must be two New Covenants, one made with the nation of Israel and another made with the Church. Both of these extremes seek to make the Church a party to the New Covenant, and both view the New Covenant as in effect during the present dispensation.

Nowhere in Scripture is it stated that the New Covenant is made with the Church. Rather, a literal interpretation of Scripture results in the understanding that God has pledged to make the New Covenant with the nation of Israel.

“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah.” (Jeremiah 31:31)

Since “the gifts and calling of God are without repentance” (Romans 11:29), God’s pledge to make a New Covenant with the nation of Israel has not changed, nor can it be revoked. Furthermore, Romans 11:26-27 reveals, “And so all Israel shall be saved … For this is my [new] covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.” Since the nation of Israel remains in unbelief during the present dispensation, it should be clear that the New Covenant is not in effect today.

Confusion arises for many theologians when they consider the blessings promised under the New Covenant. Those blessings include, in part, individual regeneration, forgiveness of sins, and an indwelling Holy Spirit (cf. Jeremiah 31:33-34; Ezekiel 36:26-27). Clearly, the Church is experiencing these very blessings (cf. Titus 3:5; Ephesians 1:7, 13-14), so they erroneously conclude that the Church must in some way be a party to the New Covenant, and that it is in effect today.

It is a fact that the work of the Lord Jesus Christ at His first advent, culminating in His death, resurrection, and ascension, secured the blessings of the New Covenant (cf. Matthew 26:28; Hebrews 9:16-17). But those blessings were secured for the nation of Israel1, and would have been made available to individual believing Jews within the nation of Israel had that generation received Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah and installed Him as King. Since that generation of the nation of Israel did not receive Jesus (John 1:11), the formal inauguration of the New Covenant was deferred and awaits that future generation of the nation of Israel which will receive Him during the Tribulation (cf. Ezekiel 20:33-37).

However, with the work of Christ having secured the blessing of the New Covenant in time, God is now free to graciously bestow those blessings upon whom He chooses without violating His attribute of justice (cf. Romans 3:23-26). He is bound by covenant with the nation of Israel to bestow these blessings upon them, once they believe (in the Tribulation/Kingdom), but He has chosen by grace to bestow many of the blessings of the New Covenant upon those who believe during the Dispensation of Grace and are incorporated into the Church. But this does not make the Church a party to the New Covenant; we do not receive these blessings by a covenant commitment, but by the grace of God.

Why is God dispensing blessings of the New Covenant to the Church today? There is more than one right answer to this question. First, “Christ loved the church, and gave himself for it” (Ephesians 5:25), and “he is the propitiation for our sins; and not ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). While Christ’s intentionality at His first advent was to redeem Israel (cf. Galatians 4:4-5; Romans 15:8), His work of propitiation was sufficient to redeem all men. Second, and often overlooked as an objective, is that God is pouring out the blessings of the New Covenant on all believers today in order “to provoke [Israel] to jealously” (Romans 11:11). It is still God’s purpose to redeem the nation of Israel and bring them into the New Covenant. One means God is using to call Israel to Himself is to bestow on the Church (i.e., Gentiles; Acts 15:14) the blessings of the New Covenant which were intended for them. Jealousy is not always a negative attribute. God Himself is jealous (Exodus 34:14), and He will engender jealously among the Jews for the blessings He is graciously bestowing upon the Church in order to eventually bring them into the New Covenant.

In conclusion, the Church has no formal relationship to the New Covenant. The New Covenant will be inaugurated by God with the nation of Israel during the coming Tribulation (in preparation for the Kingdom), and at that time He will bestow all the blessings promised under the New Covenant upon Israel according to His covenant commitment with them. In contrast, God has chosen to bestow upon the Church by grace certain blessings of the New Covenant secured by the sacrificial work of the Lord Jesus Christ, in part to provoke the rebellious nation of Israel to return to Him out of jealousy.

  1. In Matthew 26:28, Jesus asserted, “For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” See my article, “Who Are the Many?”, which explains why the pronoun “many”, when used in Scripture without a definite referent, is best understood to be a covenant descriptor for the nation of Israel.  Note that the Apostle Paul asserted that Jesus was “… made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law …” (i.e., the nation of Israel; Galatians 4:4-5). ↩︎

The Appearance of Moses and Elijah at the Transfiguration

The transfiguration of Jesus was witnessed by Peter, James, and John, and it is recorded in Matthew 17:1-9, Mark 9:2-10, and Luke 9:28-36; Peter makes mention of it in 2 Peter 1:16-18. In addition to seeing the Lord Jesus Christ in His glorified form, Moses and Elijah also appeared, talking with Jesus. Their discussion concerned Jesus’ coming “decease” (Luke 9:31) and subsequent return in “power” and “majesty” (2 Peter 1:16).  In this vision of the glorified Christ along with saints of old the disciples experienced a foretaste of the coming Messianic Kingdom (Cp., Matthew 16:28).

Considerable debate has occurred over why Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on this occasion. Some have seen in these two men representatives of the Law and the Prophets; others, believers who have died in faith versus those taken to heaven without experiencing death (Cp., 1 Thessalonians 5:17). Many have speculated that since their conversation concerned details of the Lord’s return, the event of the transfiguration supports and strengthens the view that Moses and Elijah will be the two witnesses of Revelation 11:3-13 who minister in Jerusalem during the first half of the Tribulation. All these speculations are indeed valid. However, and probably much more importantly, the vision of the glorified Lord Jesus Christ with Moses and Elijah, O.T. saints long since dead, reinforced Christ’s teaching that His own death would not prevent His coming Kingdom (Cp., Matthew 16:18), and that continued conscious existence follows death for the saints of God (Cp., Matthew 22:31-32).


How Soon is “Shortly”?

The Book of Revelation opens, “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass…” (Rev1:1a). The remainder of the book is a revelation of the details concerning the coming Rapture of the Church, the 7-year Tribulation period (i.e., Daniel’s 70th Week), the return of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the establishment of the Millennial Kingdom on this earth. When the Lord Jesus revealed these things to John the Apostle at the end of the 1st century, he said these were events that “must shortly come to pass”. To date, they have not come to pass, and almost two thousand years later we still await their fulfillment (to the scoffing of the world; Cp., 2Pet3:3-4).

Preterists connect the “shortly” of Revelation 1:1 with “this generation” of Matthew 24:34 and insist that the events of the Book of Revelation had to have occurred within the lifetimes of the Jews who were alive at the first coming of Christ. Clearly, that understanding of “shortly” cannot be valid, as the second coming of Christ did not occur in the 1st century in any literal sense. Thus, “shortly” did not mean within one generation. The question, therefore, remains, “How soon is shortly”?

The beginning of an answer to this question is found in the very passage in which the Apostle Peter warns of second coming scoffers who would arise “in the last days” (2Pet3:3-4). He goes on to conclude, “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (2Pet3:8; Cp., Ps90:4). The point is that God’s experience of time is not the same as ours, and this truth is observed throughout the scriptures.

Consider the following examples:

  • “I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over the Jordan to possess it; ye shall not prolong your days upon it, but shall utterly be destroyed” (Deut4:26). The LORD spoke these words through Moses c. 1400 BC. The first dispersion of the Jews from the Promised Land, the Babylonian exile, occurred c. 600 BC, followed by the Roman Diaspora in 70 AD. Thus, “soon” in this context meant at least ~800 years into the future, and perhaps ~1,500 years.
  • “Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither like the green herb” (Ps37:1-2). This psalm of David would have been written c. 1000 BC. The judgment of the wicked occurs at the Great White Throne, which takes place at the end of the Millennial Kingdom. Thus, “soon” in this context meant at least ~4,000 years into the future.
  • “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory” (2Cor4:17). Here, the Apostle Paul characterizes the lifetime of a person (i.e., 70-80 years; Ps90:10) as “a moment”. In Psalm 90:10, a man’s life is said to be “soon cut off”.
  • “And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen” (Rom16:20). The Apostle Paul spoke these inspired words in the 1st century. Depending on one’s understanding, the defeat of Satan will either come at the second coming of Christ, when Satan is bound in the bottomless pit (Rev20:1-2), or at the end of the Millennial Kingdom, when Satan is cast into the lake of fire (Rev20:10). Thus, “shortly” in this context meant at least ~2,000 years into the future, and perhaps ~3000 years.

Thus, when the Lord Jesus Christ told the Apostle John that the events of the Book of Revelation “must shortly come to pass” (Rev1:1), the fact that they were yet ~2,000 years into the future was entirely consistent with the way in which God characterizes time, from His perspective, throughout the scriptures (Cp., Hos5:15-6:2).


Gentiles and the Abrahamic Covenant

In Genesis 12:1-3, God initiated what would become the Abrahamic covenant (for its full development, cf. Gen12:1-7; 13:14-17; 15:7-21; 17:1-8).  This covenant was made by the LORD with Abram (i.e., Abraham), and it was unconditional; in it God made commitments to Abraham and put no obligations on him in order to receive its promises other than the faithfulness of God Himself.  The question today is, what is the relationship of Jews and Gentiles to the covenant God made with Abraham?

First, the Jews are a party to the covenant and stand to inherit all of its promises in the most literal way.  In Genesis 12:2, God viewed Abraham as more than merely a man, but as the “nation” He intended to make from him.  Furthermore, God extended the covenant to Abraham’s son Isaac (but not Ishmael; cf. Gen17:19), then to Isaac’s son Jacob (but not Esau; cf. Gen28:13-14).  No distinction is made after Jacob, such that all of Jacob’s descendants are included in the covenant (cf. Ps105:8-11).  In Romans 11:28, the Apostle Paul says that “as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sake”, where “the election” is Israel as God’s chosen nation (Isa45:4), and “the fathers” are Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Exod4:5).  Today, the Jews are the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, some of which have been gathered to the nation of Israel reestablished in 1948, but many of which remain scattered throughout the world.

Second, the Gentiles are not a party to the covenant.  Nevertheless, their salvation is provided through it; namely, “in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed” (Gen12:3; Gal3:8), since “salvation is of the Jews” (Jn4:22).  Furthermore, in the covenant there is an obligation for the Gentiles to “bless” Abraham and his descendants (i.e., the Jews), for which they are promised a blessing from God, as well as a threat that those who “curse” Abraham and his descendants will be cursed by God.  At the return of the Lord Jesus Christ, He will judge the Gentiles who survive the 7-year Tribulation period alive according to this standard (cf. Matt25:31-46).  Those Gentiles who “blessed” the Lord’s “brethren” will be granted entrance into “the [Millennial] kingdom” (Matt25:34,40), whereas those who “cursed” them will not (Matt25:41).


Did Jesus Use the Septuagint?

The view of many mainstream scholars today is that Jesus used the Septuagint (LXX; i.e., the translation of the O.T. in Greek) as His Bible. The primary evidence offered in support of this view is that many of His quotations from the O.T. appear to better match the Greek text of the LXX than the Hebrew (Masoretic) text. That evidence, however, must be weighed against the fact that the earliest extant manuscript copies of the LXX come from several centuries after Christ, creating the possibility that the Greek text for these O.T. verses could have been taken from their N.T. quotations in order to create an exact, verbatim match (which otherwise is not the pattern of scriptural quotation seen in the Bible). Is there alternative evidence in favor of Jesus’ use of the Hebrew O.T. rather than the LXX? The answer to that question is YES, and the evidence is quite compelling.

In Luke 24:44, Jesus made reference to the written O.T. scriptures:

“And [Jesus] said unto them, These are the worlds which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.”

Implicit in these words of Jesus is the structure and organization of the Hebrew Bible (which is equivalent in content to the O.T.). The books of the Hebrew Bible (i.e., TNK, or Tanakh) are organized into three sections: the law [of Moses] (Heb., Torah), the prophets (Heb., Nevi’im), and the writings (Heb., Ketuvim; the first book in this section is the Psalms). By referring to the entirety of the (O.T.) scriptures as the law, the prophets, and the psalms, Jesus presupposed the organization of the O.T. canon that appears only in the Hebrew scriptures. In contrast, the books in the LXX (which also contains many non-canonical books) are organized much like they appear in modern English Bibles (e.g., historical books, wisdom books, and prophetic books). Thus, Jesus’ words presuppose the Hebrew Bible, not the Greek Septuagint.

This presupposition of a Hebrew Bible is seen again in Matthew 23:35, where Jesus refers to the first and last martyrs in the O.T. as:

“That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.”

Abel is the first martyr recorded in Genesis 4, and Zacharias is the last martyr recorded in 2 Chronicles 24. Genesis is the first book in the Hebrew Bible, and 2 Chronicles is the last book in the Hebrew Bible. Again, Jesus’ words presuppose the Hebrew Bible, not the Greek Septuagint.

Did Jesus use the Septuagint? NO, Jesus used the Hebrew scriptures.


Who Are the Many?

The adjective/pronoun “many” occurs hundreds of times in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments. In the vast majority of those instances, the immediate context makes clear to whom/what “many” refers. However, there are a small number of important instances in which there is no definite referent for “many” (e.g., Dan8:25; 9:27; 11:14,18,26,33,34,39; 12:10; Matt19:30; 20:16; 20:28; 22:14; 26:28; Mk10:31,45; 14:24; Luk14:16); it should be noted that these instances tend to occur primarily in the O.T. and the synoptic Gospels, whose focus is the nation of Israel under the Dispensation of Law. In these instances, the “many” refers to Israel. For a study of this issue, see the article Who Are the Many? under the Biblical Studies tab.


The Identity of the 24 Elders

In Revelation 4:4, “four and twenty elders” are seen by the Apostle John sitting on “four and twenty [thrones]” in heaven.  The identity of these 24 elders has long been debated.  However, most Dispensationalists have traditionally held that the 24 elders represent the completed Church (i.e., the Body of Christ).  If that view is correct, the completed Church is in heaven before the 7-year Tribulation (i.e., the 70th Week of Daniel; Dan9:27) begins in Revelation 6, which all but necessitates a pre-tribulational rapture of the Church; such a conclusion is seemingly inescapable.  Hence, the correct identification of the 24 elders is pivotal to a proper understanding of the chronological sequence of eschatological events. A systematic analysis of the Identity of the 24 Elders can be found under the Biblical Studies tab.


Noah and Adam

Noah and Adam are related, both seminally and typologically. In many ways, Noah typologically recapitulates Adam’s original fall and its consequences for humanity. For an outline of this connection, see Noah and Adam under the Biblical Studies tab.


When Was Jesus Born?

Although Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ on December 25, that is almost certainly not the correct month/date of our Savior’s birth. Actually, Scripture gives us a relatively clear indication of when Jesus was born; namely, in the September-October timeframe. See the new Chart: WHEN WAS JESUS BORN? under the Biblical Studies tab for an overview of the calculation using scriptural clues.