Tag Archives: Daniel

Who Were the Wise Men?

In Matthew 2:1, “wise men from the east” came to the land of Israel in association with the birth of Jesus Christ.  Here, “wise men” is a translation of the Greek word, magoi.  Modern Bible translations tend to transliterate this word as magi, from which the English words magic and magician are derived, but in doing there is a danger that an occultic connotation might be associated with them.  It should be noted that the text/context of Matthew 2 suggests no such wicked association; indeed, they are the good guys in Matthew’s birth narrative.  Thus, the KJV translators properly translated magoi as “wise men”.  In contrast, the singular magos is translated as “sorcerer” relative to the “false prophet” who went by the name “Barjesus” (cf. Act13:6).

Recognizing these “wise men” as such is an important aid in their proper identification.  They came “from the east”, which is understood to be relative to Jerusalem and the land of Israel.  In Scripture, such a geographic designation generally denotes Babylon and/or Persia (cf. Gen11:2; Isa43:5; 46:11).  In Daniel 2:2, the advisors to King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon are designated as “magicians”, “astrologers”, “sorcerers”, and “Chaldeans”.  Certainly, “magicians”, “astrologers”, and “sorcerers” are all categories of occult practitioners; however, the “Chaldeans” are to be distinguished from these.  Strong’s Hebrew lexicon indicates that the “Chaldeans” (when used as a title, rather than a geographical designation) were “those persons considered to be the wisest in the land”.  After successfully interpreting Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, Daniel was promoted by the king to be “chief over all the wise men of Babylon” (Dan2:48).  Daniel outlived the Babylonian empire, and “prospered in the reign of Darius, and in the reign of Cyrus the Persian” (Dan6:28).  In Esther 1:13, we see that even during the Persian empire this caste of advisors to kings continued, characterized as “wise men, which knew the times”.  Research into extra-biblical literature indicates that these “Chaldean” wise men were an ancient and hereditary caste of scholars with particular expertise in astronomy and dream interpretation (which was undoubtedly why Nebuchadnezzar made Daniel the “chief” of their order).

That Daniel was made chief of these wise men “from the east”, and that they were experts at astronomy, provides the outline of a plausible explanation for why they knew what they knew, and why they came to Jerusalem when they did.  Balaam, the ancient prophet from Mesopotamia (cf. Deut23:4), who some suggest belonged to (or even began) their order, had long before prophesied that “there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Scepter shall rise out of Israel” (cf. Num24:15-17); that is, the arrival of a future Jewish king (i.e., the Messiah) would be heralded by a “Star”.  Observing an unusual “star”, they associated it with “he that is born King of the Jews” (Matt2:2).  That they were anticipating the season of His arrival was nearing can be inferred from the fact that they were undoubtedly in possession of, and revered, the Book of Daniel (their former chief) which predicted the very day of Messiah’s arrival (cf. Dan9:25).

To dispel common myths, they were not kings; this is erroneously supported by Psalm 72:10, which describes the millennial kingdom.  Coming from Persia, they would have ridden horses, not camels.  Nothing in the text of Matthew 2 indicates how many “wise men” there were, but there were likely many more than three.  Furthermore, having undertaken a journey of almost a thousand miles, they would have travelled in a sizable caravan that almost certainly included a military escort.  Such a large delegation from Persia arriving unexpectedly in Jerusalem was undoubtedly the reason “Herod … was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him” (Matt2:3).

Who were the “wise men”?  They were an hereditary caste of Babylonian/Persian scholars (not occultists) who had been influenced by the prophet Daniel to anticipate the coming of the Messiah who was to be the King of Israel, and who was to be “worship[ed]” by all (Matt2:2).


Signs of the Second Coming

“And what I say unto you, I say unto all, Watch.” (Mark 13:32-37)

The Lord Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and Sadducees for failing to recognize the signs of His First Coming (Matthew 16:1-3). Obvious signs they should have recognized included: 1) the virgin birth in Bethlehem (Isaiah 7:14; Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:1-12; Luke 1:26-35; 2:1-14), 2) prophesied Messianic miracles (Isaiah 61:1-2; Luke 4:16-21), and 3) Daniel’s prophecy of the 69 Weeks which gave the very day Messiah would present himself to Israel (Daniel 9:25; Luke 19:41-44).

During His ministry at His First Coming, Jesus taught there would also be signs that precede His Second Coming (Matthew 24:3ff; Luke 21:25-28). For these signs (Mark 13:4), Jesus commanded us all to “Watch” (Mark 13:32-37).

A new study titled Signs of the Second Coming has been added under Biblical Studies.


The Book of Daniel: Wisdom for Living in a Pagan Culture

The Book of Daniel is widely regarded as a book of prophecy, indeed the pre-eminent book of prophecy in the Old Testament and perhaps the whole Bible, and it surely contains some of the most detailed prophetic revelation to be found in the Word of God.  The prophecies of Daniel are all the more impressive since many of them have already been remarkably fulfilled in precise, exact, and literal detail, giving clear testimony to Jehovah as the sovereign Creator of the universe, in whose hands history is being providentially guided to His appointed end (Isaiah 46:9-11).  It is for this reason that the Book of Daniel is possibly the greatest offense to the natural man of any portion of the Word of God, and as a result it has been a primary focus of attack by both secular scholars and liberal (so-called) Christianity; in order to deny supernaturalism in general, and the God of the Bible in particular, the Book of Daniel must be destroyed.  Notwithstanding, Daniel is not primarily a book of prophecy; although the Book of Daniel consists of much prophetic material, prophecy is not necessarily its primary purpose.

Daniel’s place in the Hebrew canon is the first clue as to the real purpose of the book.  It resides in the 3rd division of the TNK (i.e., in the Writings, not in the Prophets).  While liberalism has used this fact as a point of attack, asserting that the division of the Writings was the final phase of the Hebrew canon to close and concluding this supports a “late” date for the book, this is a misunderstanding of the three divisions of the TNK.  The three divisions of the TNK were not organized on the basis of chronology, but on the basis of theme or subject matter.  The books that were put into the division of the Writings all speak to the matter of practical living, known technically as wisdom literature.

Certainly, the Book of Daniel presents both a message of comfort and hope to the nation of Israel and a message of rebuke to pagan Gentile nations in a position to oppress the Jews.  Beyond this, however, the Book of Daniel has an important personal application to the individual believer, especially the believer in latter days of the present Christian age.  The Book of Daniel was appropriately placed in the Writings division of the TNK because it was also written to give the individual believer wisdom for living in a pagan and demonized culture.

Remember that Daniel lived and worked as a government official in Babylon and Persia.  Most of the other Old Testament heroes were men who lived inside the nation of Israel under the influence of priests and prophets, in a culture saturated with God’s revelation.  Although the nation often slid into apostasy, the Temple ritual and the Hebrew Scriptures were always present as a restraining influence on the culture.  Not true for Daniel in Babylon/Persia.  Daniel had to stand for the LORD, often alone, in a culture that was completely antagonistic to Biblical truth.  In such a hostile setting, Daniel honored the LORD not by suppressing his faith in his public life, but by aggressively applying the Word of God in every area of his life.  The trend today is an increasing expectation that the believer isolate his Christian faith in a “spiritual” compartment that is only relevant to personal salvation (and perhaps a heavenly afterlife), as if the Word of God had nothing to say about history, science, education, economics, politics, etc.  The life of Daniel stands as a rebuke to that cultural trend!  Daniel’s life is a model for godly living in a pagan culture, which is either ignorant of God’s Word or has consciously rejected it.